I installed the Eastwood charts and the sample page showed correctly on my local machine.
I then tried changing the bar chart width using chbh as per
code.google.com/apis/chart/types.html#bar_charts
and the change did not manifest in eastwood
with the following change of the very last query param
localhost:8080/chart?cht=bvs&chd=s:YUVmw1&chco=0000FF&chs=180x150&chtt=Site+visitors&chts=0000FF,20&chbh=10,4
example below shows what it should end up as
chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=bvs&chd=s:YUVmw1&chco=0000FF&chs=180x150&chtt=Site+visitors&chts=0000FF,10&chbh=10,4
Cheers
J
Problem with bar chart width?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:06 pm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:06 pm
... also doesnt appear that Data scaling param is working
Comparing the output of
chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=bhg&chd=t:1,2,3,4|2,3,4,5&chco=4d89f9,c6d9fd&chtt=Blah&chds=0,5,0,5&chs=200x125
vs
localhost:8080/chart?cht=bhg&chd=t:1,2,3,4|2,3,4,5&chco=4d89f9,c6d9fd&chtt=Blah&chds=0,5,0,5&chs=200x125
The data scaling dont appear to be working...
Though. it occurred to me just now that it might be because I am using the grails plugin... which might not be updated to the latest EastWood... will try updating with latest (if it isn't already) and run the above two again
chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=bhg&chd=t:1,2,3,4|2,3,4,5&chco=4d89f9,c6d9fd&chtt=Blah&chds=0,5,0,5&chs=200x125
vs
localhost:8080/chart?cht=bhg&chd=t:1,2,3,4|2,3,4,5&chco=4d89f9,c6d9fd&chtt=Blah&chds=0,5,0,5&chs=200x125
The data scaling dont appear to be working...
Though. it occurred to me just now that it might be because I am using the grails plugin... which might not be updated to the latest EastWood... will try updating with latest (if it isn't already) and run the above two again
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:06 pm
... and it was..!
updated the eastwood plugin version libs inside the grails plugin and bingo all is fine again
j
j
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:06 pm
scaling works, but bar thickness bug still present
The scaling now works, but the bar thickness problem reported at the very beginning of the thread is definately still present.
J
J